NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Segal v Sharma [2020] NSWCA 192 Hearing dates: 24 August 2020 Date of orders: 24 August 2020 Decision date: 24 August 2020 Before: Gleeson JA Decision: (1) Leave be granted to the appellants under s 471B of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) nunc pro tunc to commence and proceed with the appeal against the second respondent, South-West Radiology Pty Ltd (in liq). Catchwords: CORPORATIONS – application for leave to proceed against a company in liquidation – Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), s 471B – whether necessary to join company as proper party where equitable assignment of part of a debt – leave granted Legislation Cited: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), s 471B Cases Cited: Distinctive FX 9 Pty Ltd v Statewide Developments Pty Ltd [2012] NSWCA 393 DSG Holdings Australia Pty Ltd v Hellenic Pty Ltd [2014] NSWCA 96; (2014) 99 ACSR 121 Federal Commissioner of Taxation v Everett (1980) 143 CLR 440 Norman v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1963) 109 CLR 9 Oceanic Life Ltd v Insurance and Retirement Services Pty Ltd (in liq) (1993) 11 ACSR 516 Ong v Lottwo Pty Ltd (in liq) [2013] SASCFC 57; (2013) 116 SASR 280 Thomas v National Australia Bank Limited [2000] 2 Qd R 448 Zervas v Burkitt [2019] NSWCA 112 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Phillip Segal (First applicant) Melita Segal (Second applicant) Praneal Dutt Sharma (First respondent) South West Radiology Pty Ltd (in liq) (Second respondent) Representation: Counsel: G P Gee (Applicants)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate