NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: R v Stonestreet [2020] NSWCCA 212 Hearing dates: 12 June 2020 Date of orders: 28 August 2020 Decision date: 28 August 2020 Before: Bell P at [1] Davies J at [2] N Adams J at [66] Decision: (1) Allow the appeal. (2) Quash the sentence imposed by Judge Grant in the District Court on 31 March 2020. (3) In lieu, sentence the respondent to a non-parole period of three years and one month commencing 15 March 2017 and expiring 14 April 2020 with a balance of term of two years and 11 months expiring 14 March 2023. Catchwords: CRIME - appeals - appeal against sentence - wound with intent to cause grievous bodily harm - mentally ill offender - where offender stabbed father multiple times whilst experiencing extreme paranoia and delusion - where offender lacked insight into his mental condition and was noncompliant with his treatment regime - whether sentence manifestly inadequate - where sentencing judge failed to take into account the protection of the community - where offender's failure to treat his illness posed a significant and ongoing risk - where offender required longer supervision – where non-parole period had expired – whether residual discretion should be exercised to dismiss appeal - sentence quashed – sentence increased without changing the non-parole period Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW) Cases Cited: Alkanaan v R [2017] NSWCCA 56 CMB v Attorney General for New South Wales (2015) 256 CLR 346; [2015] HCA 9 Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) v Burton [2020] NSWCCA 54 Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) v De La Rosa (2010) 79 NSWLR 1; [2010] NSWCCA 194 Elturk v R [2014] NSWCCA 61 R v Engert (1995) 84 A Crim R 67 R v Primmer [2020] NSWCCA 50 Veen v R (No.2) (1988) 164 CLR 465; [1988] HCA 14 Texts Cited: Nil Category: Principal judgment Parties: Crown (Appellant) Matthew Stonestreet (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: P McGrath SC (Appellant) S Howell (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate