NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Burrows v Houda [2020] NSWDC 485 Hearing dates: 20 August 2020 Date of orders: 20 August 2020 Decision date: 27 August 2020 Jurisdiction: Civil Before: Gibson DCJ Decision: Orders: (1) Imputations 6(b) and (10(b) struck out with leave to replead as "the plaintiff so misconducted herself during a court case that the judge recommended that she be referred for possible disciplinary action". (2) Pursuant to Uniform Civil Procedure Rules r 28.2, imputations 10(c), (d) and (e) are reasonably capable of being conveyed. (3) The plaintiff have leave to file an amended statement of claim in 7 days containing the following amendments: (a) Imputations 6(b) and 10(b) as repleaded; (b) Typographical corrections to imputation 10(c) and paragraphs 11 and 13; (c) Additional particulars of aggravated damages; (d) The particulars of publication as set out in Mr Rasmussen's submissions; and (e) Attaching a USB containing coloured scanned copies of the Twitter posts which are pleaded to be the matters complained of. (4) Defendant pay plaintiff's costs of the application. Catchwords: TORT – defamation – capacity of imputations – emoticons and emoji - meaning of "zipper-mouth face" emoji Legislation Cited: Practice Note 6 (District Court Defamation List) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 ("UCPR") rr 15.19, 28.2 Cases Cited: Australian News Channel Pty Ltd v Voller [2020] NSWCA 102 AvePoint, Inc. v. Power Tools, Inc 981 F. Supp. 2d 496 (W.D. Va. 2013). Bolton v Stoltenberg [2018] NSWSC 1518 Brose v Balauskas [2020] QDC 15 Corby v Alan & Unwin Pty Ltd [2014] NSWCA 227 Dell'Olio v Associated Newspapers Ltd [2011] EWHC 3472 Dow Jones & Co Inc v Gutnick (2002) 210 CLR 575; (2002) 194 ALR 433; (2002) 77 ALJR 255 Drummoyne Municipal Council v Australian Broadcasting Corporation (1990) 21 NSWLR 135 Favell v Queensland Newspapers Pty Ltd (2005) 79 ALJR 1716 Hockey v Fairfax Media Publications Pty Limited & Ors (No 2) (2015) 237 FCR 127; [2015] FCA 750 Houston -v- Barniville & ors; Houston -v- Geoghegan & ors; Houston -v- The General Council of The Bar of Ireland; Houston -v- The General Council of The Bar of Ireland; Houston -v- O'Neill [2019] IEHC 601 Church v MGN Limited [2012] 1 WLR 284 Gould v Jordan [2020] FCA 1191 Joukhador v Network Ten Pty Limited [2020] FCA 746 Loder v Bolton [2020] NSWCA 45 Lord McAlpine of West Green v Bercow [2013] EWHC 1342 Monroe v Hopkins [2017] EWHC 433 Nationwide News v Hibbert [2015] NSWCA 13 Schenck v. United States, 249 U.S. 47 Sube and another v News Group Newspapers Ltd and another [2018] EWHC 1234 The School for Excellence Pty Ltd v Trendy Rhino Pty Ltd [2018] VSC 514 Trkulja v Google LLC (2018) 263 CLR 149 Texts Cited: Defamation Costs Working Group 2013: Final Report Professor E Goldman, "Emoji Law 2018 Year-in-Review" R Smyth, "What do Trial Judges Cite?", Evidence from the New South Wales District Court" [2018] UNSWLawJl 9 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Plaintiff: Zali Burrows Defendant: Adam Houda Representation: Counsel: Plaintiff: Mr R Rasmussen Defendant: Mr T B Senior
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate