NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Architecture Design Studio (NSW) Pty Ltd v Canterbury-Bankstown Council [2020] NSWLEC 1398 Hearing dates: 12 June 2020 and 17 June 2020 Date of orders: 31 August 2020 Decision date: 31 August 2020 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Horton C Decision: The Court orders that: (1) The Applicant is granted leave to amend the application and rely upon the amended plans marked Exhibit A and other documents listed at [3] subject to the Applicant paying the Respondent's costs thrown away pursuant to s 8.15(3) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 as agreed or assessed. (2) The appeal is dismissed. (3) Development consent for Development Application No. 376/2018 seeking consent for the demolition of existing structures and the construction of a three storey boarding house over basement car park on land at 1 Ernest Street North, Lakemba is refused. (4) All Exhibits are returned except for Exhibits A, Q and 6. Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION – State Environmental Planning Policy (Affordable Rental Housing) – boarding house development in R4 High Density Residential zone – weight given to draft Local Environmental Plan – clause 30A character of the local area Legislation Cited: Canterbury Local Environmental Plan 2012 Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Land and Environment Court 1979 State Environmental Planning Policy (Affordable Rental Housing) 2009 Cases Cited: Alamdo Holdings Pty Limited v The Hills Shire Council [2012] NSWLEC 1302 Maygood Australia Pty Ltd v Willoughby City Council [2013] NSWLEC 142 Omid Mohebati-Arani v Kuringai Council [2017] NSWLEC 143 Terrace Tower Holdings Pty Limited v Sutherland Shire Council (2003) 129 LGERA 195; [2003] NSWCA 289 Veloshin v Randwick Council [2007] NSWLEC 428 Wang v Canterbury City Council [2013] NSWLEC 1098 Texts Cited: Canterbury Development Control Plan 2012 Canterbury Development Control Plan 2012, Amendment No. 5 Land and Environment Court of New South Wales, COVID-19 Pandemic Arrangements Policy, (March 2020) Category: Principal judgment Parties: Architecture Design Studio (NSW) Pty Ltd (Applicant) Canterbury-Bankstown Council (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: M Seymour with T Poisel (Applicant) M Bonnano (Solicitor) (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate