NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Komlotex Pty Ltd v AMP Ltd (No 2) [2020] NSWSC 1149 Hearing dates: 26 August 2020 Decision date: 26 August 2020 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Ward CJ in Eq Decision: Orders made as per Annexure A to these reasons. Catchwords: CIVIL PROCEDURE — Representative proceedings — Conduct of proceedings — Group members — Opting out — Distribution of opt out notices and related matters CIVIL PROCEDURE — Representative proceedings — Conduct of proceedings — Whether representative plaintiff in duplicative stayed proceeding should be provided access to documents and related matters Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), ss 56, 176 Cases Cited: Akins v Abigroup Ltd (1998) 43 NSWLR 539 Findex Group Ltd v iiNet Ltd [2019] NSWSC 1198 Harman v Secretary of State for the Home Department [1983] 1 AC 280 Komlotex Pty Ltd v AMP Ltd [2020] NSWSC 504 Springfield Nominees Pty Ltd v Bridgelands Securities Ltd (1992) 38 FCR 217 Wigmans v AMP Ltd [2020] NSWCA 104 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Komlotex Pty Ltd (First Plaintiff) Fernbook (Aust) Investments Pty Ltd (Second Plaintiff) AMP Limited (First Defendant) Marion Antoinette Wigmans (Interested Party) Representation: Counsel: CA Moore SC with G Donnellan (Plaintiffs) EA Collins SC with IJM Ahmed (Defendant) A Hochroth (Interested Party)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate