NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Roberto Saenz de Heredia [2018] NSWDC 540 Hearing dates: 20, 21, 25 and 26 June 2018 Decision date: 20 July 2018 Jurisdiction: Criminal Before: Hoy SC DCJ Decision: Expert Evidence excluded. Pt 3.3, ss 76, 79, 135 and 137 of the Evidence Act 1995 (NSW), s 130A Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW) Catchwords: EVIDENCE — Opinion evidence — Exceptions — Expert opinion — Handwriting expert — Probative value — unfair prejudice — Expert Witness Code of Conduct — Australian Society of Forensic Document Examiners — American Society for Testing Material Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) Cases Cited: Dasreef Pty Ltd v Hawchar (2011) 243 CLR 588 HG v The Queen (1990) 197 CLR 414 Honeysett v The Queen (2014) 253 CLR 122 Makita (Australia) Pty Ltd v Sprowles (2001) 52 NSWLR 705 R v Chen [2018] NSWCCA 106 R v Dickman [2017] HCA 2 R v SG [2017] NSWCCA 202 R v Wood [2012] NSWCCA 21 Texts Cited: Nil Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Director of Public Prosecutions (Crown) Roberto Saenz de Heredia (Accused) Representation: Counsel: V Lydiard - Crown B Vasic and M Fleeton - Accused
Solicitors: H Warnock, S Meechan - Crown P Conaghan - Accused File Number(s): 2016/00147902 Publication restriction: Nil
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate