NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Bell v NSW Trustee & Guardian; Estate of William Anthony Hickey [2020] NSWSC 1164 Hearing dates: 3, 4 and 5 August 2020 Date of orders: 28 August 2020 Decision date: 28 August 2020 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Robb J Decision: (1) Order that the plaintiffs' amended statement of claim, filed on 16 May 2018, be dismissed. (2) Order that Probate of the will of William Anthony Hickey dated 22 April 2016 in solemn form be granted to the cross claimant NSW Trustee & Guardian. (3) Order that further compliance with the probate rules be dispensed with. (4) Order that the matter be remitted to the Registry to complete the grant. Catchwords: SUCCESSION — Contested probate — Testamentary capacity — where it is clear that the deceased had formed his own view about his testamentary arrangements — where the deceased understood the extent of the property of which he was disposing — where the deceased was able to comprehend and appreciate the claims to which he ought to give effect — where, although the deceased sustained a devastating brain injury as a teenager, the deceased did not lack testamentary capacity in the Banks v Goodfellow sense Cases Cited: Banks v Goodfellow (1870) LR 5 QB 549 Ryan v Dalton; Estate of Ryan [2017] NSWSC 1007 Category: Principal judgment Parties: June Ann Bell (first plaintiff) Catherine Martha Robinson (second plaintiff) NSW Trustee & Guardian (defendant) Representation: Counsel: L Ellison SC (plaintiffs) R Wilson SC (defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate