NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Aliabadi v R [2020] NSWCCA 224 Hearing dates: 28 August 2020 Decision date: 02 September 2020 Before: Hoeben CJ at CL at [1]; Davies J at [2]; Adamson J at [3] Decision: (1) Leave to appeal refused. Catchwords: SENTENCING — Appeal against sentence — Assessment of objective seriousness — Where sentencing judge's findings accorded with submissions made by applicant at sentence hearing — Whether House v The King error — No error demonstrated SENTENCING — Appeal against sentence — Adequacy of reasons — No inadequacy of reasons Cases Cited: Baines v R [2016] NSWCCA 132 House v The King (1936) 55 CLR 499; [1936] HCA 40 Mulato v R [2006] NSWCCA 282 R v Isaacs (1997) 41 NSWLR 374 Zreika v R [2012] NSWCCA 44; (2012) 223 A Crim R 460 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Mohammad Eini Aliabadi (Applicant) Regina Representation: Counsel: A Karim (Applicant) G Newton (Crown)
Solicitors: Sydney Criminal Law Specialists (Applicant) Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (Crown) File Number(s): 2018/231419 Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: District Court Jurisdiction: Criminal Date of Decision: 29 October 2019 Before: Frearson SC ADCJ File Number(s): 2018/231419
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate