Do v Commissioner for Fair Trading [2020] NSWCATOD 101

Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Do v Commissioner for Fair Trading [2020] NSWCATOD 101 Hearing dates: 11 May 2020 Date of orders: 3 September 2020 Decision date: 03 September 2020 Jurisdiction: Occupational Division Before: D Robertson, Senior Member Decision: The decision under review is affirmed Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – Tattooist's licence – fit and proper person – public interest Legislation Cited: Commercial Agents and Private Inquiry Agents Act 2004 (NSW) Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 (NSW) Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) Firearms Act 1996 (NSW) Law Enforcement (Powers and Responsibilities) Act 2002 (NSW) Security Industry Act 1997 (NSW) Public Health Act 2010 (NSW) Tattoo Parlours Act 2012 (NSW) Tattoo Parlours Regulation 2013 (NSW) Weapons Prohibition Act 1998 (NSW) Cases Cited: AJO v Director-General, Department of Transport [2012] NSWADT 101 Allen v Commissioner for Fair Trading [2015] NSWCATAD 273 Austin v Commissioner of Police [2016] NSWCATAP 179 Butler v Commissioner for Fair Trading (2017) NSWCATAD 138 Cox v NSW Fair Trading [2019] NSWCATOD 170 Haley v Commissioner of Fair Trading, Department of Finance Services and Innovation [2017] NSWCATAD 48 Hawes v Commissioner for Fair Trading [2017] NSWCATAD 30 Lu v Commissioner for Fair Trading (No 2) [2018] NSWCATAD 221 McDonald v Commissioner for Fair Trading [2017] NSWCATAD 330 Merino v Commissioner for Fair Trading [2019] NSWCATOD 137 Smith v Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force [2014] NSWCATAD 184 Wright v Commissioner for Fair Trading (2017) NSWCATAD 98 Texts Cited: None cited Category: Principal judgment Parties: Thai Nguyen Do (Applicant) Commissioner for Fair Trading (First Respondent) Commissioner of Police (Second Respondent) Representation: Counsel: R Coffey (Respondents)