NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Wallis v Rudek [2020] NSWCA 207 Hearing dates: 29 May 2020 Date of orders: 7 September 2020 Decision date: 07 September 2020 Before: White JA at [1]; Emmett AJA at [11]; Simpson AJA at [119] Decision: Order that: 1. The appeal is dismissed. 2. The Appellants are to pay the Respondent's costs of the appeal. Catchwords: EQUITY — Equitable interest in property – Family arrangement — Transferee pays off mortgage on property — Equity in property exceeds amount owing — Transferor permitted to remain in property – licence agreement not signed — Relationship breakdown – Baumgartner v Baumgartner equity — Equitable compensation granted. EQUITY — Equitable remedies — Specific performance — Estoppel — Determination of existence and content of underlying contractual terms. EQUITY — Equitable remedies — Equitable compensation — Assessment — Valuation of property for purposes of assessment. Legislation Cited: Nil Cases Cited: Baumgartner v Baumgartner (1987) 164 CLR 137; [1987] HCA 59 Calderbank v Calderbank [1976] Fam 93; (1975) 3 All ER 333 Muschinski v Dodds (1985) 160 CLR 583; [1985] HCA 78 Texts Cited: Nil Category: Principal judgment Parties: Yuri Wallis (First Appellant) Olga Wallis (Second Appellant Suzanne Rudek (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: B Oliak (Appellants) J Bennett (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate