NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v S.I.M [2020] NSWDC 503 Hearing dates: 26 August 2020 Date of orders: 2 September 2020 Decision date: 02 September 2020 Jurisdiction: Criminal Before: Priestley SC DCJ Decision: See [75] Catchwords: CRIME — Sexual offences — Sexual Intercourse without consent CRIMINAL PROCEDURE — Trial — Separate trial application Legislation Cited: Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW) Cases Cited: Sutton v The Queen (1984) 152 CLR 528 De Jesus v R [1986] HCA 65 R v Mostyn [2004] NSWCCA 97 O'Leary v R (1946) 73 CLR 566 R v Player [2000] NSWCCA 123 Adam v R [1999] NSWCCA 189 Harriman v R (1989) 167 CLR 590 TWL v R [2012] NSWCCA 57 LJW v R [2010] NSWCCA 114 DJS v R [2012] NSWCCA 9 KRM v The Queen 2001 HCA 11 R v Anna Zhang [2005] NSWCCA 437 Texts Cited: Nil Category: Principal judgment Parties: Regina (Crown) S.I.M (Accused) Representation: Counsel: Smith Crown Prosecutor Kluss Counsel for the accused, File Number(s): 2019/00083475 Publication restriction: Section 578A Crimes Act provides a person shall not publish any matter which identifies the complainant in prescribed sexual offence proceedings or any matter which is likely to lead to the identification of the complainant.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate