NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Norcross Pictorial Calendars Pty Ltd v Central Coast Council [2020] NSWSC 1201 Hearing dates: 24, 25 and 27 August 2020 Date of orders: 4 September 2020 Decision date: 04 September 2020 Jurisdiction: Equity - Technology and Construction List Before: Stevenson J Decision: Plaintiffs entitled to damages; Council's claim for misleading or deceptive conduct to be dismissed Catchwords: CONTRACTS – joint venture to develop Council's land into car park and residential-commercial development CONTRACTS – parties – whether second plaintiff a successor to first plaintiff and able to sue under joint venture agreement CONTRACTS – where land contaminated with asbestos and other substances – whether council liable under indemnity – whether claim under indemnity out of time CONTRACTS – where council agreed to grant easement - where council granted easement and then rescinded motion granting easement – proper construction of easement provision – whether plaintiffs suffered loss CORPORATIONS – damages – reflective loss – whether shareholder can recover diminution of value of its shareholding that reflects loss of company CONSUMER LAW – misleading or deceptive conduct – whether first plaintiff's failure to provide Council with geotechnical report prior to entry into joint venture agreement was misleading or deceptive – whether warranties and indemnities in joint venture agreement should be declared void Legislation Cited: Local Government Act 1993 (NSW) Local Government (Council Amalgamations) Proclamation 2016 (NSW) Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) Cases Cited: CCP Australian Airships Ltd v Primus Telecommunications Pty Ltd [2004] VSCA 232 Chartbrook Ltd v Persimmons Homes Ltd [2009] AC 1101 Chen v Karandonis [2002] NSWCA 412 Demagogue Pty Ltd v Ramensky (1992) 39 FCR 31; [1992] FCA 851 Fabcot Pty Ltd v Port Macquarie-Hastings Council [2011] NSWCA 167 Fitzgerald v Masters (1956) 95 CLR 420; [1956] HCA 53 Gould v Vaggelas (1985) 157 CLR 215; [1985] HCA 75 Johnson v Gore Wood & Co [2002] 2 AC 1 Kowalczuk v Accom Pty Ltd (2008) 77 NSWLR 205; [2008] NSWCA 343 Olsson v Dyson (1969) 120 CLR 365; [1969] HCA 3 Penrith City Council v Government Insurance Office of NSW (1991) 24 NSWLR 564 Prudential Assurance Co Ltd v Newman Industries Ltd (No 2) [1882] 1 Ch 204 Rafferty v Madgwicks (2012) 203 FCR 1; [2012] FCAFC 37 Servilleja v Marex Financial Ltd [2020] UKSC 31 Seymour Whyte Constructions Pty Ltd v Ostwald Bros Pty Ltd [2019] 99 NSWLR 317; [2019] NSWCA 11 Software Integrators Pty Ltd v Roadrunner Couriers Pty Ltd (1997) 69 SASR 288 Trident General Insurance Co Ltd v McNiece Bros Pty Ltd (1988) 165 CLR 107; [1988] HCA 44 Texts Cited: K Lewison & D Hughes, The Interpretation of Contracts in Australia (2012, Lawbook Co) Category: Principal judgment Parties: Norcross Pictorial Calendars Pty Ltd (First Plaintiff) PTL Land Pty Ltd (Second Plaintiff) Central Coast Council (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: M Condon SC with N Bentley (Plaintiffs) R D Marshall SC with E A Walker (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate