NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Precise Training Pty Ltd v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2020] NSWSC 1202 Hearing dates: 28 August 2020 Date of orders: 4 September 2020 Decision date: 04 September 2020 Jurisdiction: Equity - Applications List Before: Williams J Decision: Security for costs awarded in the sum of $199,900 on account of the estimated future costs to be incurred by the defendant in the proceeding. Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – applications – security for costs – discretionary considerations – relevance of delay – where delay has caused no prejudice – whether proceeding defensive in character – binary approach to characterisation of proceeding as defensive or otherwise not appropriate – defensive element not determinative – security ordered PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – applications – security for costs – quantum – relevance of delay – security for costs awarded in respect of estimated future costs only Legislation Cited: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), s 1335 Payroll Tax Act 2007 (NSW), ss 10, 11, 79, Pt 5 and Pt 10 Div 1 Taxation Administration Act 1996 (NSW), ss 44, 96, 97, 99, 100, 103, 104 and 119 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), r 42.21 Cases Cited: Chocron v Onkoud [2018] NSWSC 1205 Commissioner of Taxation v Vasiliades (2016) 344 ALR 558; [2016] FCAFC 170 Cornelius v Global Medical Solutions Australia Pty Ltd (2014) 98 ACSR 301; [2014] NSWCA 65 Modakboard Australia Pty Ltd v Matthew Howard Brady [2018] NSWSC 399 Oswal v Commissioner of Taxation (No 2) [2015] FCA 1143 PPK Willoughby Pty Ltd v Baird [2019] NSWCA 48 Re Colorado Products Pty Ltd (in prov liq) [2013] NSWSC 611 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Precise Training Pty Ltd (First Plaintiff/First Respondent) The Ville Holdings Pty Ltd (Second Plaintiff/Second Respondent) AVS Group Australia Pty Ltd (Third Plaintiff/Third Respondent) Slim Enterprise Pty Ltd (Fourth Plaintiff/Fourth Respondent) Kings Head Tavern South Pty Ltd (Fifth Plaintiff/Fifth Respondent) Superior Family Investments Pty Ltd (Sixth Plaintiff) Chief Commissioner of State Revenue (Defendant/Applicant) Representation: Counsel: Mr A E Maroya with Mr F Tao (First to Fifth Plaintiffs/Respondents) Mr T Lynch SC with Mr I Mescher (Defendant/Applicant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate