NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Kirby v Health Care Complaints Commission [2020] NSWSC 1207 Hearing dates: 13 December 2019 Date of orders: 7 September 2020 Decision date: 07 September 2020 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Harrison AsJ Decision: THE COURT ORDERS THAT: (1) The amended summons filed 2 May 2019 is dismissed. (2) Costs are reserved. Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – Judicial review – Health Care Complaints Act 1993 (NSW) s 90B – Whether NCAT had jurisdiction to hear disciplinary proceedings against the plaintiff – Whether NCAT is a "disciplinary body" under s 4 – Application dismissed Legislation Cited: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW), ss 3, 7, 16, 17 Health Care Complaints Act 1993 (NSW), ss 3, 3A, 4, 80, 90B Interpretation Act 1987 (NSW), s 33 Health Practitioner National Regulation Law (NSW) No 86a, ss 4, 139e, 145C, 145O, 149A, 149C, 165B Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW), s 69 Cases Cited: Davis v City North Infrastructure Pty Ltd [2012] 2 Qd R 103 Project Blue Sky Inc v Australian Broadcasting Authority (1998) 194 CLR 355 SZTAL v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2017) 262 CLR 362 Category: Principal judgment Parties: David William Kirby (Plaintiff) Health Care Complaints Commission (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: J Sheller SC with D Tang (Plaintiff) P Lowson (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate