NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Ruyters v Commissioner of Police [2020] NSWCATAD 223 Hearing dates: 11 December 2019 Date of orders: 9 September 2020 Decision date: 09 September 2020 Jurisdiction: Administrative and Equal Opportunity Division Before: K Ransome, Senior Member Decision: The decision under review is affirmed. Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – administrative review - Government Information – refusal to deal with application – whether substantial and unreasonable diversion of agency's resources – consideration of s 60(3A) and (3B) factors – meaning of "general public interest" in s 60(3B) – nature of balancing task to be undertaken by decision-maker in determining whether dealing with an application would require an unreasonable and substantial diversion of the agency's resources Legislation Cited: Administrative Decisions Review Act 1997 Government Information (Public Access) Act 2009 Government Information (Public Access) Amendment Act 2018 Cases Cited: Cianfrano v Director General, Premier's Department [2006] NSWADT 137 Colefax v Department of Education and Communities (No. 2) [2013] NSWADT 130 Commissioner of Police v Danis [2017] NSWCATAP 7 Craig Williamson Pty Ltd v Barrowcliff [1915] VLR 450 Hanna v NSW Ministry of Health [2019] NSWCATAD 21 Loussikian v University of Sydney [2018] NSWCATAD 140 Zonneyville v Department of Finance, Services and Innovation [2017] NSWCATAD 186 Texts Cited: Department of Justice, Statutory Review: Government Information (Public Access) Act 2009 and the Government Information (Information Commissioner) Act 2009 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Michelle Ruyters (Applicant) Commissioner of Police (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate