NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Dumas [2020] NSWDC 520 Hearing dates: 22, 24 & 30 April 2020 Decision date: 30 April 2020 Jurisdiction: Criminal Before: King SC DCJ Decision: Convicted. Special circumstances found to take account of the period in custody served as a result of the revocation of parole. Indicative sentences: 001 – 3 years and 8 months - NPP of 2 years and 3 months 002 – 2 years and 4 months Aggregate sentence: Sentenced to a term of imprisonment for 4 years comprising a NPP of 2 years, 9 months and 21 days to commence on 10/7/19 and to expire on 30/4/22, and a balance of term of 1 year, 2 months and 9 days to expire on 9/7/23. Catchwords: CRIME – property offences - sentence – robbery armed with offensive weapon, a barbeque multi-tool - aggravated break and enter & commit serious indictable offence, people there - on parole at time of offences – institutionalisation – parity – subjective matters Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 Cases Cited: Beale v R [2015] NSWCCA 120 Bugmy v the Queen [2013] HCA 37 249 Callaghan v R [2006] NSWCCA 58 R v Fernando [2002] NSWCCA 28 R v Henry & Ors [1999] NSWCCA 111 R v Huynh [2003] NSWCCA 239 R v McVittie [2002] NSWCCA 344 R v Moffatt (1990) 20 NSWLR 114 R v Thomson; R v Houlton (2000) 49 NSWLR 383 Category: Sentence Parties: Regina Isaac Dumas Representation: Counsel: Defence: Mr J Tyler-Stott Solicitors: Crown: Ms L Hill File Number(s): 2018/00329480
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate