NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Al Batat & Ors (No 17) [2020] NSWSC 1246 Hearing dates: 11 September 2020 Date of orders: 11 September 2020 Decision date: 11 September 2020 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Hamill J Decision: The application for leave under s 38 of the Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) to cross-examine witness is granted. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - evidence - unfavourable witness - whether leave should be granted to cross-examine - whether prior inconsistent statement - where earlier application granted on limited basis - whether leave should be granted to allow Prosecutor to put motive to witness - alleged motive to assist the accused - application granted Legislation Cited: Evidence Act 1995, ss 38 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Regina Abdallah Hassan Al Batat Ying Cheng Luo Ian Fan Jaiyu Liu Jacob Blake Bayliss Nai An Li Representation: Counsel: P Hogan (Crown) B Rigg SC (Al Batat) R Webb (Luo) T Quilter (Fan) N Carroll (Liu) A Norrie (Bayliss) D Carroll (Li)
Solicitors: Solicitor for the NSW DPP (Crown) TS Law Firm (Al Batat) Voros Lawyers (Luo) Zahr & Partners (Fan) George Sten & Co (Liu) Ross Hill Lawyers (Bayliss) Younes & Espiner (Li) File Number(s): 2018/214586 (Al Batat) 2017/170943 (Luo) 2017/168582 (Fan) 2017/168476 (Liu) 2017/321618 (Bayliss) 2018/214894 (Li) Publication restriction: No publication until conclusion of trial
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate