NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Agoris [2020] NSWDC 535 Hearing dates: 31 August, 1, 2 September 2020 Decision date: 04 September 2020 Jurisdiction: Criminal Before: Hatzistergos DCJ Decision: In respect of the indictment dated 31 August 2020, the Accused is found:- (1) Guilty of Count 1 (2) Guilty of Count 2 Catchwords: CRIME – Judge alone trial – Accused charged with two counts of inciting the supply a prohibited drug – One count concerning methylamphetamine – One count concerning buprenorphine – Where the Accused is an inmate at a correctional facility – Where the only fact in issue is whether the Accused incited another to supply drugs – Whether the Accused had the intention to incite where the person approached was an established drug dealer Legislation Cited: Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW), s 133 Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 (NSW), ss 25, 27 Cases Cited: De Silva v The Queen [2019] HCA 48; (2019) 94 ALJR 100 Filippou v The Queen [2015] HCA 29; (2015) 256 CLR 47 Fleming v R (1998) 197 CLR 250 Liberato v The Queen (1985) 159 CLR 507 R v Eade [2002] NSWCCA 257; (2002) 131 A Crim R 390 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Regina (Crown) Christos Agoris (Accused) Representation: Counsel: Mr M. Rollestone (Crown) Mr D. McMahon (Accused)
Solicitors: Director of Public Prosecutions (Crown) Eliopoulos Lawyers (Accused) File Number(s): 2019/40662 Publication restriction: N/A
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate