NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Davies v Whitehaven Coal Mining Limited [2020] NSWCA 219 Hearing dates: 18 May 2020 Decision date: 21 September 2020 Before: Macfarlan JA at [1]; McCallum JA at [2]; Simpson AJA at [79] Decision: (1) Allow the appeal; (2) Set aside the judgment of the primary judge entered on 30 August 2019; (3) Set aside the costs order entered on 26 September 2019; (4) Remit the proceedings to the primary judge to assess damages in accordance with these reasons; (5) Order the respondent to pay the appellant's costs of the proceedings and the appeal. Catchwords: NEGLIGENCE — General principles — where appellant injured while climbing down from top of load haul dump machine ("LHD") — whether employer created an unnecessary risk of injury by modifying LHD prior to the injury — where modification required appellant to climb to top of LHD to refuel where previously refuelling was done from the ground — where no evidence that any form of risk assessment was carried out — where rungs and handholds used for climbing already attached to LHD and considered adequate safeguards by employer TORTS — General principles — Contributory negligence — where employer relied on fact that appellant had climb to top of machine without incident numerous times prior to injury — where employer alleged that injury would not have occurred if appellant had been exercising sufficient care for his own safety — where appellant gave evidence that he had been firmly gripping the handholds when descending from top of LHD Legislation Cited: Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW), s 3B(1)(f) Evidence Act 1995 (NSW), s 136 Workers Compensation Act 1987 (NSW) Cases Cited: Commissioner for Railways v Halley (1978) 20 ALR 409 Czatyrko v Edith Cowan University (2005) 214 ALR 349; [2005] HCA 14 Kempsey District Hospital v Thackham (1995) 36 NSWLR 492 Sungravure Pty Ltd v Meani (1964) 110 CLR 24 at 37‑9; [1964] HCA 16 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Rodney John Davies (Appellant) Whitehaven Coal Mining Limited (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Ian D Roberts SC (Appellant) D R Benson (Appellant) L King SC (Respondent) T M Rowles (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate