NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Jamal v State of New South Wales (No 2) [2020] NSWDC 544 Hearing dates: On the papers Defendant's Written Submissions – 31 July 2020 Plaintiff's Written Submissions – 14 August 2020 Date of orders: 18 September 2020 Decision date: 18 September 2020 Jurisdiction: Civil Before: Hatzistergos DCJ Decision: The Defendant to pay the Plaintiff's costs. Catchwords: COSTS – Where Defendant has provided an offer of compromise – Where judgment more favourable than the offer – Whether costs should ordinarily follow the event Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), ss 62, 63, 98 Law Enforcement (Powers and Responsibilities) Act 2002 (NSW), s 99 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), rules 20.6, 42.1, 42.15, 42.32 Cases Cited: Alamdo Holdings Pty Limited v Australian Window Furnishings (NSW) Pty Ltd [2008] NSWSC 7 Calderbank v Calderbank [1976] Fam 93; [1975] 3 All ER 333 FDC Constructions & Fitout Pty Ltd v Condensing Vaporises Australia Pty Ltd (t/as RJ Tinker and Son) [2013] NSWSC 1073 Halsey v Milton Keynes General NHS Trust; Steel v Joy [2004] 4 All ER 920 Jamal v State of New South Wales [2020] NSWDC Jones v Sutton (No 2) [2005] NSWCA 203 Miwa Pty Ltd v Siantan Properties Pte Ltd (No 2) [2011] NSWCA 344 O'Neill v Williams & anors (costs) [2007] NSWSC 51 Sanders v Snell (No 2) (2000) 174 ALR 53 University of New South Wales International House Ltd v University of New South Wales (No 2) [2017] NSWSC 306 Category: Costs Parties: Jon Jamal (Plaintiff) State of New South Wales (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: Ms L. Goodchild (Plaintiff) Ms E. Bathurst (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate