NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Mete Corporation Group Pty Ltd v Sarina [2020] NSWSC 1304 Hearing dates: 19 August 2020; further written submissions ending 24 August 2020 Date of orders: 19 August, 24 September 2020 Decision date: 24 September 2020 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Parker J Decision: See [38]-[39] Catchwords: CIVIL PROCEDURE – interim preservation – freezing orders – defendant a natural person resident in Australia – defendant lives in home owned by company (not a party) as trustee for family trust – company enters into contract for sale of home – freezing orders refused against defendant and company – costs – order for payment of sum to company on account of costs of application Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), s 98(4) Uniform Civil Procedures Rules 2005 (NSW), r 42.7 Cases Cited: Barnes v Addy (1874) LR 9 Ch App 244 Cardile v LED Builders Pty Ltd (1999) 198 CLR 380 French v Bremner (No 2) [2019] NSWSC 1504 Heperu Pty Ltd v Belle (2009) 76 NSWLR 230 Moustapha v Nelson (No 3) [2020] NSWSC 1263 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Mete Corp Group Pty Ltd (First Plaintiff/First Applicant) Abraham Mete (Second Plaintiff/Second Applicant) Clinton Sarina (Defendant/First Respondent) Willela Holdings Pty Ltd (Second Respondent) Representation: Counsel: A Rogers (Plaintiffs/Applicants) D Pritchard SC (Defendant/Respondents)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate