NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: EKZ v Active Kids Group Pty Ltd [2020] NSWCATAD 20 Hearing dates: 3 June 2020 Date of orders: 26 August 2020 Decision date: 26 August 2020 Jurisdiction: Administrative and Equal Opportunity Division Before: A Britton, Principal Member E Hayes, General Member Decision: (1) The complaint of discrimination on the grounds of disability is dismissed. Catchwords: EQUAL OPPORTUNITY — direct discrimination — determination of less favourable treatment EQUAL OPPORTUNITY — distinction between direct and indirect discrimination Legislation Cited: Anti-Discrimination Act 1977 (NSW) Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW) Disability Discrimination Act 1992 (Cth) Cases Cited: Catholic Education Office v Clarke (2004) 138 FCR 121; [2004] FCAFC 197 Hurst v Queensland (2006) 151 FCR 562; [2006] FCAFC 100 Purvis v New South Wales (Department of Education and Training) (2013) 217 CLR 92; [2003] HCA 62 Waters v Public Transport Corporation (1992) 173 CLR 349; [1991] HCA 49 Texts Cited: None cited Category: Principal judgment Parties: EKZ and ELA (Applicants) Active Kids Group Pty Ltd (Respondent) Representation: In person (Applicants) Penhall & Co Lawyers (Respondent) File Number(s): 2019/00400927 Publication restriction: Pursuant to s 64 of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013, publication of the name of the Applicants, EKZ and ELA and their son, ELB is prohibited.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate