NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Gregg v R [2020] NSWCCA 245 Hearing dates: 22-24 April 2020 Decision date: 30 September 2020 Before: Bathurst CJ at [1]; Hoeben CJ at CL at [712]; Leeming JA at [713] Decision: (1) Appeal allowed. (2) Quash the verdict of guilty on each count of the indictment dated 9 May 2017 and enter a verdict of acquittal on each count. Catchwords: CRIME – appeals – appeal against conviction – unreasonable verdict – offences contrary to s 1307(1) of the Corporations Act 2001 (NSW) – sham agreement – whether sufficient evidence of the parties' intentions and knowledge to convict – whether Crown able to exclude a particular hypothesis beyond reasonable doubt CRIME – appeals – appeal against conviction – miscarriage of justice – prosecutor's closing address – rhetorical questions – obligation of prosecutor – references to "no evidence" – reversal of onus of proof CRIME – appeals – appeal against conviction – miscarriage of justice – written summing up – whether trial judge's summing up presented the case for each party in a fair and balanced manner CRIME – appeals – appeal against conviction – error of law – evidence – relevance – opinion evidence – whether trial judge erred in admitting evidence CRIME – appeals – appeal against conviction – error of law – evidence – relevance – authenticity of a document – whether trial judge erred in refusing to admit evidence – National Australia Bank Ltd v Rusu not followed CRIME – appeals – appeal against conviction – error of law – jury directions – change in Crown case – definition of "false" in the context of sham – direction on sham – direction as to who was the directing mind of a company CRIME – appeals – appeal against conviction – error of law – jury directions – question trail which was said to require "yes" or "no" answers – direction that the jury needed only to be satisfied that the Crown case was reasonable – reversal of the burden of proof CRIME – appeals – appeal against conviction – error of law – whether trial judge erred in refusing to give a Mahmood direction CRIME – appeals – appeal against conviction – verdict of acquittal substituted Legislation Cited: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth) Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) Cases Cited: Antov v Bokan [2018] NSWSC 1474 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Air New Zealand (No 1) (2012) 207 FCR 448; [2012] FCA 1355 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v ActiveSuper Pty Ltd (in liq) (2015) 235 FCR 181; [2015] FCA 342 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Rich [2005] NSWSC 417; 216 ALR 320 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Westpac Banking Corporation (No 2) [2018] FCA 751; (2018) 127 ACSR 110 Australian Securities Commission v Marlborough Gold Mines Ltd (1993) 177 CLR 485; [1993] HCA 15 Bank of Valletta PLC v National Crime Authority (1999) 90 FCR 565; [1999] FCA 1099 Bilta (UK) Ltd (in liq) v Nazir (No 2) [2016] AC 1 Budrodeen v R [2014] NSWCCA 332 Burrell v R [2009] NSWCCA 193 Capital Securities XV Pty Ltd v Calleja [2018] NSWCA 26 Chiro v The Queen (2017) 260 CLR 425; [2017] HCA 37 Coshott v Prentice (2014) 221 FCR 450; [2014] FCAFC 88 Daw v Toyworld (NSW) Pty Ltd [2001] NSWCA 25 Dickson v R (2017) 94 NSWLR 476; [2017] NSWCCA 78 Domican v The Queen (1992) 173 CLR 555; [1992] HCA 13 DPP v Pinn [2015] NSWSC 1684 El Ajou v Dollar Land Holdings PLC [1994] 2 All ER 685 Environment Protection Authority v Truegain Pty Ltd (2013) 85 NSWLR 125; [2013] NSWCCA 204 Environmental Protection Authority v Sydney Water Corporation Ltd (1997) 98 A Crim R 481 Equuscorp Pty Ltd v Glengallan Investments Pty Ltd (2004) 218 CLR 471; [2004] HCA 55 Federal Commissioner of Taxation v Cassaniti (2018) 266 FCR 385; [2018] FCAFC 212 Fennell v The Queen [2019] HCA 37; (2019) 93 ALJR 1219 Gilham v R [2012] NSWCCA 131 Hadchiti v R (2016) 93 NSWLR 671; [2016] NSWCCA 63 Hamilton v Whitehead (1988) 166 CLR 121; [1988] HCA 65 Hannes v Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) (No 2) [2006] NSWCCA 373; 60 ACSR 1 Johnson v Miller (1937) 59 CLR 467; [1937] HCA 77 Jones Lang LaSalle (NSW) Pty Ltd v Taouk [2012] NSWCA 342 Justins v R (2010) 79 NSWLR 544; [2010] NSWCCA 242 La Trobe Capital & Mortgage Limited v Hay Property Consultants Pty Ltd (2011) 190 FCR 299; [2011] FCAFC 4 Lewis v Condon (2013) 85 NSWLR 99; [2013] NSWCA 204 Libke v The Queen (2007) 230 CLR 559; [2007] HCA 30 Lithgow City Council v Jackson (2011) 244 CLR 352; [2011] HCA 36 M v The Queen (1994) 181 CLR 487; [1994] HCA 63. Mahmood v The State of Western Australia (2008) 232 CLR 397; [2008] HCA 1 McKell v The Queen (2019) 264 CLR 307; [2019] HCA 5 Meridian Global Funds Management Asia Ltd v Securities Commission [1995] 2 AC 500 Miles v Bull (1969) 1 QB 258 Montgomery v Stewart (1967) 116 CLR 220; [1967] HCA 11 Moore v R [2016] NSWCCA 185 Moulin Global Eyecare Trading Ltd (in liq) v Commissioner of Inland Revenue [2014] HKCFA 22 National Australia Bank Ltd v Rusu (1999) 47 NSWLR 309; [1999] NSWSC 539 O'Meara v Dominican Fathers [2003] ACTCA 24; 153 ACTR 1 Pell v R [2020] HCA 12; (2020) 94 ALJR 394 Picken v R [2007] NSWCCA 319; ARS v R [2011] NSWCCA 266 R v Apostilides (1984) 154 CLR 563; [1984] HCA 38 R v Hillier (2007) 228 CLR 618; [2007] HCA 13 R v MG (2007) 69 NSWLR 20; [2007] NSWCCA 57 R v Micallef [2002] NSWCCA 480; (2002) 136 A Crim R 127 Roads and Traffic Authority (NSW) v Graincorp Operations Ltd [2010] NSWCA 317 Rockdale Beef Pty Ltd v Industrial Commission of NSW [2007] NSWCA 128; 165 IR 7 S v The Queen (1989) 168 CLR 266; [1989] HCA 66 Saffron v The Queen (1988) 17 NSWLR 395 Scott v Commissioner of Taxation (Cth) (No 2) (1966) 40 ALJR 265 Sharrment Pty Ltd v Official Trustee in Bankruptcy (1988) 18 FCR 449 SKA v The Queen (2011) 243 CLR 400; [2011] HCA 13 Snook v London and West Riding Investments Ltd [1967] 2 QB 786 Tesco Supermarkets Ltd v Nattrass [1972] AC 153 The Bell Group Ltd (In liq) v Westpac Banking Corporation (No 9) (2008) 39 WAR 1; [2008] WASC 239 The Queen v Baden-Clay (2016) 258 CLR 308; [2016] HCA 35 Towney v R [2018] NSWCCA 65 Walsh v Tattersall (1996) 188 CLR 77; [1996] HCA 26 Whitehorn v R (1983) 152 CLR 657; [1983] HCA 42 Wood v R (2012) 84 NSWLR 581; [2012] NSWCCA 21 Texts Cited: V Bell, "Documentary Evidence under the Evidence Act 1995 (NSW)" (2001) 5(1) The Judicial Review 1 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Peter Alan Gregg (Appellant) The Crown (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: T Game SC with J Roy (Appellant) T McDonald SC with M England (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate