NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Karpatsis v Parole Authority of New South Wales [2020] NSWSC 1326 Hearing dates: 17 September 2020 Decision date: 30 September 2020 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Rothman J Decision: (1) Application dismissed; (2) Proceedings dismissed. Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – appeal under Crimes (Administration of Sentences) Act 1999 (NSW) – refusal of parole by State Parole Authority – whether decision based on false, misleading or irrelevant information – application dismissed Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), s 112(1)(a) Crimes (Administration of Sentences) Act 1999 (NSW), ss 135, 137B, 139, 155 Cases Cited: Burbank Australia Pty Ltd v Luzinat [2000] VSC 128 Esho v Parole Board Authority of NSW [2006] NSWSC 304 Fairfax Media Publications Pty Ltd v Cummings (2012) 269 FLR 182; [2012] ACTCA 36 Parisienne Basket Shoes Pty Ltd v Whyte (1938) 59 CLR 369; [1938] HCA 7 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Spiros Karpatsis (Applicant) Parole Authority of New South Wales (First Respondent) Attorney General for New South Wales (Second Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Self-represented (Applicant) Submitting appearance (First Respondent) P Aitken (Second Respondent)
Solicitors: Self-represented (Applicant) Crown Solicitor's Office (Respondents) File Number(s): 2020/222762
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate