NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Super Vision Resources Ltd v AC Holdings Co Pty Ltd [2020] NSWCA 244 Hearing dates: 29 September 2020 Decision date: 30 September 2020 Before: McCallum JA Decision: Parties directed to bring in short minutes of order in accordance with these reasons. Catchwords: CIVIL PROCEDURE – appeal from decision dismissing claim to have sales transactions declared void – where respondents gave undertakings in the nature of freezing orders to preserve the moneys the subject of the appeal – application by respondents for release of funds for legal expenses and living expenses of company director Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) Conveyancing Act 1919 (NSW), s 37A Cases Cited: Cardile v LED Builders Pty Ltd (1999) 198 CLR 380; [1999] HCA 18 Goumas v McIntosh [2002] NSWSC 713 Super Vision Resources Ltd v AC Holdings Co Pty Ltd [2020] NSWSC 65 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Super Vision Resources Ltd (Appellant) AC Holdings Co Pty Ltd (First Respondent) Qiao Wang (Second Respondent) Lawrence Xu (Third Respondent) Representation: Counsel: J Knackstredt (Appellant) B Zipser (First and Second Respondents)
Solicitors: Ashurst (Appellant) Zhang Shijing Lawyers (Respondents) File Number(s): 2020/57328 Publication restriction: None Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: Supreme Court of New South Wales Jurisdiction: Equity Division Citation: [2020] NSWSC 65 Date of Decision: 14 February 2020 Before: Stevenson J File Number(s): 2019/76024
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate