NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Shaw v Secretary Department of Education [2020] NSWCATAD 243 Hearing dates: 11 September 2020 Date of orders: 2 October 2020 Decision date: 02 October 2020 Jurisdiction: Administrative and Equal Opportunity Division Before: C A Ludlow, Senior Member Decision: Leave is granted for the following complaint to proceed : (a) That the respondent discriminated against Patrick Shaw on the ground of his disability contrary to s 49B(1)(b) of the Anti-Discrimination Act 1977 by requiring him to comply with a requirement or condition, namely to use handwriting in school rather than a laptop. (b) That the respondent discriminated against Patrick Shaw on the ground of his disability contrary to s 49L(2)(c)) of the Anti-Discrimination Act by subjecting him to a detriment, namely a decline in his learning outcomes. Catchwords: EQUAL OPPORTUNITY - application for leave to proceed with complaint – disability discrimination in education – whether nature of complaint has changed – whether amendment permissible – whether fair and just to grant leave to proceed Legislation Cited: Anti-Discrimination Act 1977 (NSW) Cases Cited: Ekermawi v Administrative Decisions Tribunal of New South Wales & Ors [2009] NSWSC 143 Prakash v Bobb Borg Enterprises Pty Limited [1999] NSWADT 73 Rodwell v Terrey Hills Golf & Country Club Holdings Ltd trading as Terrey Hills Golf & Country Club [2014] NSWCATAD 34 Texts Cited: None cited Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Rebecca Shaw obo Patrick Shaw (Applicant) Secretary, Department of Education (Respondent) Representation: Solicitors" Applicant (Self Represented) Respondent (Self Represented) File Number(s): 2020/00223815 Publication restriction: Nil
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate