NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Karim (Overseas) Pty Limited v Francis [2020] NSWSC 1344 Hearing dates: 15 September 2020 Date of orders: 15 September 2020 Decision date: 15 September 2020 Jurisdiction: Equity - Duty List Before: Henry J Decision: Interim injunction extended. See paragraph [51]. Catchwords: EQUITY – Interim relief – no issue of principle – injunction obtained ex parte – whether injunction should be discharged because plaintiff failed to disclose material matters – whether balance of convenience favours the extension of the injunction – injunction extended for three weeks – plaintiff ordered to file evidence in support of its claims Legislation Cited: Nil Cases Cited: Australian Broadcasting Corporation v O'Neill (2006) 227 CLR 57; [2006] HCA 46 Beecham Group Ltd v Bristol Laboratories Pty Ltd (1968) 118 CLR 618; [1968] HCA 1 Castlemaine Toohey Limited v South Australia (1986) 161 CLR 148; [1986] HCA 58 Harrem Pty Ltd v Tebb [2006] NSWSC 1415 Nutek Constructions Pty Ltd v Slotwinski [2017] NSWSC 1795 Patterson v BTR Engineering (Aust) Ltd (1989) 18 NSWLR 319 Texts Cited: Nil Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Karim (Overseas) Pty Limited (Plaintiff)
Edgar Elias Francis (First Defendant) Kevin Nol (Second Defendant) Representation: Counsel: F Gee (First Defendant)
Solicitor: J Ireland (Plaintiff)
Solicitors: DC Balog & Associates (Plaintiff) Corrs Chambers Westgarth (First Defendant) File Number(s): 2020/262113 Publication restriction: Nil
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate