NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Shi v R [2020] NSWCCA 258 Hearing dates: 21 September 2020 Decision date: 07 October 2020 Before: Hoeben CJ at CL at [1]; Rothman J at [2]; N Adams J at [96 ] Decision: (1) Leave granted under r 4 of the Criminal Appeal Rules (NSW) to allow the arguing of this ground of appeal; (2) Leave to appeal granted; (3) Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIME – Sentence Appeal – Direction on jury's care with comparison of handwriting – operation of Rule 4 – no error and no miscarriage Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), ss 38(a), 61I Criminal Appeal Rules (NSW), r 4 Evidence Act 1995 (NSW), ss 135, 165 Cases Cited: Collins v R [2006] NSWCCA 162 R v Doney (2001) 126 A Crim R 271; [2001] NSWCCA 463 Shepherd v The Queen (1990) 170 CLR 573; [1990] HCA 56 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Ling Shi (Applicant) Crown (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: T Ramrakha (Applicant) H Roberts (Respondent)
Solicitors: Legal Aid NSW (Applicant) Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) (Respondent) File Number(s): 2017/00354203 Publication restriction: Pursuant to s 578A of the Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), publication of any matter which could identify the victim is prohibited. Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: Sydney District Court Jurisdiction: Crime Date of Decision: 17 May 2019 Before: Pickering SC DCJ File Number(s): 2017/00354203
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate