NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Bates v R [2020] NSWCCA 259 Hearing dates: 25 September 2020 Decision date: 07 October 2020 Before: Simpson AJA at [1] Rothman J at [2] Bellew J at [3] Decision: (1) Leave to appeal granted. (2) Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – Sentence – Appeal – Offences of dangerous driving occasioning death and dangerous driving occasioning grievous bodily harm – Where applicant was driving a B-double vehicle along a motorway – Applicant took eyes off the road in order to retrieve a drink and removed both hands from the wheel – Vehicle suddenly left the northbound carriageway, crossed a wide median strip and entered the southbound carriageway where it collided with another vehicle killing the passenger and severely injuring the driver – Two drivers behind forced to take evasive action and collided with the trailer of the applicant's truck after it had come to rest – Where sentencing judge found that this was not a case of momentary inattention – Whether this was a "typical" case of the kind identified in R v Whyte – Whether aggregate sentence of 4 years and 6 months' imprisonment with a non-parole period of 3 years' imprisonment was manifestly excessive – Serious offending – Not a typical case attracting the strict application of the guideline – Level of notional accumulation justified having regard to the injuries sustained to the driver – Finding of manifest excess not supported by reference to sentencing outcomes in other cases – Leave to appeal granted – Appeal dismissed Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) Cases Cited: Cahyadi v R (2007) 168 A Crim R 41; [2007] NSWCCA 1 Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) (Cth) v De La Rosa (2010) 79 NSWLR 1; [2010] NSWCCA 194 FL v R [2020] NSWCCA 114 Hili v The Queen; Jones v The Queen (2010) 242 CLR 520; [2010] HCA 45 Moodie v R [2020] NSWCCA 160 Preston v R (2011) 57 MVR 346; [2011] NSWCCA 25 R v Clampitt-Wotton (2002) 37 MVR 340; [2002] NSWCCA 383 R v Whyte (2002) 55 NSWLR 252; [2002] NSWCCA 343 Vaiusu v R [2017] NSWCCA 71 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Jeffrey Bates – Applicant Regina – Respondent Representation: Counsel: L Brasch – Applicant M Kumar – Respondent
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate