NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Chen v Commissioner NSW Police Force [2020] NSWCATAD 245 Hearing dates: 10 June 2020, 22 June 2020 (final submissions) Date of orders: 6 October 2020 Decision date: 06 October 2020 Jurisdiction: Administrative and Equal Opportunity Division Before: A Britton, Principal Member Decision: Leave for the complaint to proceed is refused under s 96(1) of the Anti-Discrimination Act 1977 (NSW). Catchwords: HUMAN RIGHTS — equal opportunity — whether leave required for complaint to proceed — principles applying to grant of leave WORDS AND PHRASES — meaning of "services" in s 19 of the Anti-Discrimination Act 1977 (NSW) Legislation Cited: Anti-Discrimination Act 1977 (NSW) Police Act 1990 (NSW) Cases Cited: Burns v Sunol (No 2) [2017] NSWCATAD 236 Commissioner of Police v Mohamed [2009] NSWCA 432 Hussein v Sydney Trains [2020] NSWCATAD 155 IW v City of Perth (1997) 191 CLR 1; [1997] HCA 30 at 7 Nicholls & Nicholls v Director-General Department of Education and Training (No 2) [2009] NSWADTAP 20 Sivananthan v Commissioner of Police [2001] NSWADT 44 Texts Cited: None cited Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Chin-Kuang Chen (Applicant) Commissioner NSW Police Force (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: J Seymour (Respondent)
Solicitors: Applicant (Self Represented) Office of General Counsel, NSW Police Force (Respondent) File Number(s): 2020/00132946 Publication restriction: Nil
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate