NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Application of Huy Huynh under Part 7 of the Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 for an Inquiry [2020] NSWSC 1356 Hearing dates: On the papers Decision date: 13 October 2020 Jurisdiction: Common Law - Criminal Before: Garling J Decision: Application Dismissed Catchwords: CRIME — Appeal and review — Application to Supreme Court for inquiry into conviction under Part 7 Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 – applicant convicted of a single conspiracy to import offence having multiple importations of a controlled substance – where appeal against conviction dismissed and special leave refused - whether a single conspiracy charge was an abuse of process – whether jury directions were appropriate - applicant raises arguments already raised and dealt with on appeal – no new evidence – application dismissed Legislation Cited: Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth) Cases Cited: Agius v R; Abibadra v R; Jandagi v R; Zerafa v R [2011] NSWCCA 119 Application of Peter James Holland under s 78 Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 [2008] NSWSC 251 Cranney v R; Huynh v R [2017] NSWCCA 234 Gerakiteys v R (1984) 153 CLR 317 Huynh v The Queen [2019] HCASL 6 R v James William Shepherd (1988) 37 A Crim R 303 R v LK; R v RK [2010] HCA 17; (2010) 241 CLR 177 Savvas v The Queen [1995] HCA 29; (1995) 183 CLR Varley v Attorney General (NSW) (1987) 8 NSWLR 30 Texts Cited: Not Applicable Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Huy Huynh (Applicant) Attorney-General of NSW (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Huy Huynh (Applicant) P Aitken (NSW Attorney-General) File Number(s): 2020/86959 Publication restriction: Not Applicable
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate