NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: LH v R [2020] NSWCCA 262 Hearing dates: 16 July 2020 Date of orders: 15 October 2020 Decision date: 15 October 2020 Before: Payne JA at [1]; Wilson J [2]; Ierace J [115] Decision: 1. Leave to appeal against the convictions recorded against the applicant with respect to counts 2 and 3 is refused Catchwords: CRIME – appeals – appeal against conviction – child sexual assault offences – asserted inconsistencies in evidence of Crown witnesses – whether the verdicts were unreasonable – whether there was a miscarriage of justice Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW) Cases Cited: Gilbert v The Queen (2000) 201 CLR 414; [2000] HCA 15 Libke v The Queen (2007) 239 CLR 599; [2007] HCA 30 MFA v The Queen (2002) 213 CLR 606; [2002] HCA 53 M v The Queen (1994) 181 CLR 487; [1994] HCA 63 Pell v The Queen (2020) 376 ALR 478; [2020] HCA 12 R v Dudko (2002) [2000] NSWCCA 336; 132 A Crim R 371 R v Milat (Court of Criminal Appeal (NSW), 26 February 1998, unrep) SKA v The Queen (2011) 243 CLR 400; [2011] HCA 13 The Queen v Baden-Clay (2016) 258 CLR 308; [2016] HCA 35 Category: Principal judgment Parties: LH (Appellant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: D Shridhar (Appellant) C Curtis (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate