NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Al Batat & Ors (No 24) [2020] NSWSC 1387 Hearing dates: 25 September 2020 Date of orders: 25 September 2020 Decision date: 13 October 2020 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Hamill J Decision: (1) Leave granted to the Prosecutor to re-open examination in chief of the witness Martina Sellers (a pseudonym). Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - evidence - not a very good witness - misunderstanding between counsel - video of identification procedure not led in chief - Prosecutor believed identification not in issue - sought to lead evidence to bolster credibility of witness - unpersuasive application - where misunderstanding apparent in the course of argument - identification evidence important - leave granted Legislation Cited: Evidence Act 1995 (NSW), ss 26, 192 Cases Cited: R v Al Batat & Ors (No 20) [2020] NSWSC 1319 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Regina Abdallah Hassan Al Batat Ying Cheng Luo Ian Fan Jaiyu Liu Jacob Blake Bayliss Nai An Li Representation: Counsel: P Hogan (Crown) B Rigg SC (Al Batat) R Webb (Luo) T Quilter (Fan) N Carroll (Liu) A Norrie (Bayliss) D Carroll (Li)
Solicitors: Solicitor for the NSW DPP (Crown) TS Law Firm (Al Batat) Voros Lawyers (Luo) Zahr & Partners (Fan) George Sten & Co (Liu) Ross Hill Lawyers (Bayliss) Younes & Espiner (Li) File Number(s): 2018/214586 (Al Batat) 2017/170943 (Luo) 2017/168582 (Fan) 2017/168476 (Liu) 2017/321618 (Bayliss) 2018/214894 (Li) Publication restriction: No publication until conclusion of trial
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate