NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Osman v State Parole Authority & the Attorney General of New South Wales [2020] NSWSC 1392 Hearing dates: 6 October 2020 Date of orders: 12 October 2020 Decision date: 12 October 2020 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Wilson J Decision: (1) Summons filed on 6 October 2020 is dismissed; (2) Subject to order (3), costs on an ordinary basis against the plaintiff; (3) Should either party seek an order for costs different to that specified at order (2), submissions and evidence should be filed and served by 30 November 2020; with any submissions and evidence in reply to be filed and served by 13 December 2020. Any variation to order (2) will be determined on the papers. Catchwords: JUDICIAL REVIEW – Administrative law – decision of State Parole Authority to refuse parole – "terrorism offender" – application and construction of Division 3A of Part 6 of the Crimes (Administration of Sentence) Act 1999 (NSW) – whether Parole Authority misconstrued s 159C(1) – whether Parole Authority had regard to irrelevant material and failed to have regard to relevant material – whether there was jurisdictional error – whether there was error on the face of the record Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) Crimes (Administration of Sentence) Act 1999 (NSW) Criminal Code (Cth) Interpretation Act 1987 (NSW) Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW) Cases Cited: Alcan (NT) Alumina Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Territory Revenue (2009) 239 CLR 27; [2009] HCA 41 Attorney General of New South Wales v New South Wales State Parole Authority [2006] NSWSC 865 Attorney General of New South Wales v Chiew Seng Liew [2012] NSWSC 1223 Briginshaw v Briginshaw (1938) 60 CLR 336; [1938] HCA 34 Carrascalao v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2017) 252 FCR 352; [2017] FCAFC 107 Craig v South Australia (1995) 184 CLR 163; [1995] HCA 58 Esho v Parole Board Authority of NSW [2006] NSWSC 304 Fernandez v Government of Singapore (1971) 1 WLR 987 Hossain v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2018) 264 CLR 123; [2018] HCA 34 Kirk v Industrial Court (NSW) (2010) 239 CLR 531; [2010] HCA 1 Malec v JC Hutton Pty Ltd (1990) 169 CLR 368; [1990] HCA 20 Minister for Aboriginal Affairs v Peko-Wallsend Ltd (1986) 162 CLR 24; [1986] HCA 40 State of New South Wales v Elmir (Final) [2019] NSWSC 1867 Texts Cited: Terrorism Legislation Amendment (Police Powers and Parole) Bill 2017 (NSW) Category: Principal judgment Parties: Maywand Osman (Plaintiff) State Parole Authority of New South Wales (First Defendant) The Attorney General of New South Wales (Second Defendant) Representation: Counsel: G Bashir (SC), I Nash & N Broadbent (Plaintiff) Submitting Appearance (First Defendant) Dr D Kell SC & Z C Heger (Second Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate