NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Massarani v Kriz [2020] NSWCA 252 Hearing dates: 2 July 2020 Decision date: 13 October 2020 Before: Basten JA at [1]; Leeming JA at [2]; McCallum JA at [3] Decision: (1) Dismiss the application for leave to appeal from the judgment in the District Court; (2) Order the applicant to pay the respondents' costs of the application. Catchwords: CIVIL PROCEDURE – application for leave to appeal from decision dismissing action for defamation summarily – contest as to basis for primary judge's decision – whether proposed appeal provided the occasion for appellate consideration of the decision in Bleyer v Google Inc – where pleading admittedly deficient – relevance of considerations of proportionality to discretion to grant leave to replead Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), ss 60, 61, 64, 67 District Court Act 1973 (NSW), ss 127(2) Limitation Act 1969 (NSW), s 14B Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), rr 13.4(1)(b), 14.28 Cases Cited: Armstrong v McIntosh (No 2) [2019] WASC 379 Bleyer v Google Inc (2014) 88 NSWLR 670; [2014] NSWSC 897 El-Mouelhy v Qsociety of Australia Inc (No 2) [2015] NSWSC 990 Farrow v Nationwide News Pty Ltd (2017) 95 NSWLR 612; [2017] NSWCA 246 Feldman v The Daily Beast Company LLC [2017] NSWSC 831 Fox v Channel Seven Adelaide Pty Ltd (No 2) [2020] SASC 180 Garrard (t/as Arthur Anderson & Co) v Email Furniture Pty Ltd (1993) 32 NSWLR 662 GG Australia Pty Ltd v Sphere Projects Pty Ltd (No 2) [2017] FCA 664 Ghosh v NineMSN Pty Ltd (2015) 90 NSWLR 595; [2015] NSWCA 334 Jaycar Pty Limited v Lombardo [2011] NSWCA 284 Khalil v Nationwide News Pty Ltd (No 2) [2018] NSWDC 126 Lazarus v Azize [2015] ACTSC 344 Smith v Lucht [2014] QDC 302 Toben v Nationwide News Pty Ltd (2016) 93 NSWLR 639; [2016] NSWCA 296 Toomey v John Fairfax & Sons Ltd (1985) 1 NSWLR 291 Watney v Kencian [2017] QCA 116 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Patrick Massarani (Applicant) Georgia Kriz (First Respondent) Ilya Klauzner (Second Respondent) Representation: Counsel: A Morris QC, N Li (Applicant) B McClintock SC, L Saunders (First Respondent) B McClintock SC, T Senior (Second Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate