NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Cakan v Health Care Complaints Commission [2020] NSWCATOD 116 Hearing dates: 17 August 2020 Date of orders: 16 October 2020 Decision date: 16 October 2020 Jurisdiction: Occupational Division Before: J Boland AM ADCJ, Deputy President Decision: (1) The amended application by Irfan Cakan for a non publication order dated 25 June 2020 is dismissed. Catchwords: HEALTH – professional registration and discipline – where practitioner seeks non-publication order under s 64 of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW) – whether special or exceptional circumstances exist Legislation Cited: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW) Health Care Complaints Act 1993 (NSW) Health Practitioner Regulation National Law Cases Cited: Health Care Complaints Commission v BXD [2015] NSWCATOD 135 Health Care Complaints Commission v EDE [2019] NSWCATOD 184 Health Care Complaints Commission v Vo [2014] NSWCATOD 127 Health Care Complaints Commission v XC [2015] NSWCATOD 9 Texts Cited: None cited Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Irfan Cakan (Applicant) Health Care Complaints Commission (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Mr C Mitchell (Respondent)
Solicitors: Irfan Cakan (self represented) (Applicant) Health Care Complaints Commission (Respondent) File Number(s): 2017/00089412 Publication restriction: Nil
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate