NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: CBS Leasing Pty Ltd v Imseis [2020] NSWSC 1408 Hearing dates: 21-22 September 2020 Date of orders: 13 October 2020 Decision date: 13 October 2020 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Darke J Decision: Orders to be made in accordance with [100] of reasons. Catchwords: LAND LAW – leases – agreement for lease – breach – related company of plaintiff enters into contract for sale of premises with defendants – completion of contract for sale conditional upon entry into Agreement for Lease between defendants as landlord and plaintiff as tenant – Agreement to Lease entered into and sale completed – Agreement for Lease requires defendants to undertake Landlord's Works with practical completion to occur by defined date – whether date varied by agreement – handover of premises to plaintiff to occur to allow plaintiff to perform Tenant's Works– liquidated damages payable if Landlord's Works delayed beyond defined date – damages calculated on daily basis until handover occurs – held that handover occurred when plaintiff granted access to commence Tenant's Works and received set of keys – liquidated damages calculated accordingly CONSUMER LAW – misleading conduct under statute – misleading or deceptive conduct – representations – cross-claimants contend cross-defendant falsely represented that Construction Certificate for development had been approved – representation held to be misleading – cross-claimants did not adduce evidence that had cross-defendant's conduct not occurred they would have taken a different course and thereby avoided loss – cross-claimants' claim for damages under Australian Consumer Law fails Legislation Cited: Australian Consumer Law, ss 18, 30, 236 Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), s 100 Cases Cited: Campbell v Backoffice Investments Pty Ltd (2009) 238 CLR 304; [2009] HCA 25 Ireland v WG Riverview Pty Ltd (2019) 101 NSWLR 658; [2019] NSWCA 307 Category: Principal judgment Parties: CBS Leasing Pty Ltd (Plaintiff) Ebrahim Imseis (First Defendant) Rima Imseis (Second Defendant) Representation: Counsel: Mr D S Weinberger (Plaintiff) Mr P Cutler (Defendants)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate