NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: ACN 057 690 034 Pty Limited v Wykrota [2020] NSWSC 1430 Hearing dates: 7 October 2020 Date of orders: 16 October 2020 Decision date: 16 October 2020 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Rees J Decision: Dismiss motion to set aside judgment as made irregularly, against good faith or in the absence of the first defendant, with costs. Catchwords: LEGAL PROFESSION – duty of candour – undefended hearing – principles at [83], [91] – no breach of duty – trial judge not misled. SET ASIDE JUDGMENT – building contract –problems getting occupation certificate – damages sought from builder including loss of rent – first defendant appeared in person on occasion – 12 directions hearings – no appearance at final hearing – aware of hearing – unsatisfactory medical certificate – inadequate explanation – experienced litigant – access to legal advice – writ of execution registered against first defendant's property – property sold and judgment sum paid into court – application to set aside judgment, being 18 months after judgment. JUDGMENT IRREGULARLY OBTAINED – r 36.15 UCPR – principles at [3]-[7] – whether admissions arising from failure to file defence provided basis for judgment – imperfect pleading against multiple defendants – admissions by first defendant founded judgment against him – whether damages awarded outside pleaded case – damages sought notified to first defendant in schedule of damages – no misconduct or dishonourable conduct by plaintiff –failure to accord procedure fairness no basis to set aside judgment (nor such unfairness here). JUDGMENT IN ABSENCE OF PARTY – r 36.16 UCPR – principles at [8]-[12] – inadequate explanation for failure to attend – significant delay in bringing application – inadequate explanation for delay – little proffered to reduce hardship of judgment creditor – second defendant now deregistered – plaintiff took large discount in its claim before trial judge in order to finalise proceedings and only the judgment amount secured – offers in respect of plaintiff's legal costs parsimonious – arguable defence – not unjust to let judgment stand. Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), ss 91(2),101 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), rr 36.15, 36.16, 36.16(2)(b) Cases Cited: Acclaim Holdings Pty Ltd v Vlado [1989] 1 WAR 128 ACN 057 690 034 Pty Limited v Wykrota [2019] NSWSC 197 ACN 076 676 438 Pty Ltd (in liq) v A-Comms Teledata Pty Ltd [2000] WASC 214 Alexander v Ajax Insurance Co Ltd [1956] VLR 436 Anlaby v Praetorius (1888) 20 QBD 764 BH Australia Constructions Pty Ltd v Kapeller (2019) 100 NSWLR 367; (2019) 375 ALR 159; [2019] NSWSC 1086 Burrell v R (2008) 238 CLR 218; [2008] HCA 34 Coles v Burke (1987) 10 NSWLR 429 Collie v Merlaw Nominees Pty Limited [2003] VSC 424 Commonwealth Bank of Australia v Buffett (1993) 114 ALR 245 D'Orta-Ekenaike v Victoria Legal Aid (2005) 223 CLR 1; [2005] HCA 12 Daly v Silley [1960] VR 353 Day v Sternhell [2020] NSWSC 513 Deputy Commissioner of Taxation v Tabuso (2013) 94 ATR 343; [2013] NSWSC 688 DJL v Central Authority (2000) 201 CLR 226 Fenato v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue (2010) 78 NSWLR 20; [2010] NSWCA 80 Kavia Holdings Pty Ltd v Werncog Pty Ltd [1999] NSWSC 839 Kendell v Carnegie (2006) 68 NSWLR 193; [2006] NSWCA 302 Leichhardt Council v Geitonia Pty Ltd (No 7) [2015] NSWLEC 79 Magnate Projects Pty Ltd v Youma Constructions (No 2) Pty Ltd [2005] NSWCA 331 Miltonbrook Pty Limited v Westbury Holdings Kiama Pty Limited (2008) 71 NSWLR 262; [2008] NSWCA 38 Northey v Bega Valley Shire Council [2012] NSWCA 28 Perpetual Trustees Australia Ltd v Heperu Pty Ltd (No 2) (2009) 78 NSWLR 190; [2009] NSWCA 387 Pethybridge v Stedikas Holdings Pty Ltd [2007] NSWCA 154 Pham v Gall [2020] NSWCA 116 Vacuum Oil Co Pty Ltd v Stockdale (1942) 42 SR NSW 239 White v Weston [1968] 2 QB 647 Zakaria v Dr Noyce [2012] NSWSC 981 Texts Cited: G E Dal Pont, Lawyers' Professional Responsibility (6th ed, 2017, Law Book Company) Category: Principal judgment Parties: ACN 057 690 034 Pty Limited (Plaintiff) Mick Wykrota (First Defendant) Arrowfab Pty Limited (Second Defendant) Arrowcon Construction Pty Limited (Third Defendant) Representation: Counsel: Mr EC Muston SC / Mr S Jayasuriya (Plaintiff) Mr JM Ireland, Solicitor (First Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate