NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: BSM1 v Trustees of the Vincentian Fathers [2020] NSWSC 1439 Hearing dates: 07 August 2020 Date of orders: 19 October 2020 Decision date: 19 October 2020 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Garling J Decision: Notice of Motion filed 11 June 2020 dismissed Catchwords: CIVIL PROCEDURE — Suppression and non-publication – s 8(1) of the Court Suppression and Non-publication Orders Act 2010 – whether providing a statement during police investigation makes an individual a 'witness' under s 8(1)(d) – whether non-publication is necessary to protect psychological safety under s 8(1)(c) Legislation Cited: Court Suppression and Non-publication Orders Act 2010 Cases Cited: AB (A Pseudonym) v R (No 3) [2019] NSWCCA 46; (2019) 97 NSWLR 1046 D1 v P1 (No 2) [2012] NSWCA 440 DRJ v Commissioner of Victim's Rights [2020] NSWCA 136 Hogan v Australian Crime Commission [2010] HCA 2; (2010) 240 CLR 651 John Fairfax & Sons Ltd v Police Tribunal (NSW) (1986) NSWLR 465 Nationwide News Pty Ltd v Qaumi [2016] NSWCCA 97 Rinehart v Welker [2011] NSWCA 403; (2011) 93 NSWLR 311 Texts Cited: Not Applicable Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: BSM1 (P) Trustees of the Vincentian Fathers (D) Commissioner of Police (Applicant) Representation: Counsel: J Hillier (P) D Vella (D) N Evans (Applicant)
Solicitors: Ken Cush & Associates (P) Makinson d'Apice Lawyers (D) Crown Solicitor for NSW (Applicant) File Number(s): 2019/330515 Publication restriction: Not applicable
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate