NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Brien v Mrad [2020] NSWCA 259 Hearing dates: 5 August 2020 Date of orders: 21 October 2020 Decision date: 21 October 2020 Before: Macfarlan JA at [1]; Payne JA at [2]; McCallum JA at [47] Decision: (1) Leave to appeal granted on ground 1 of the draft notice of appeal; (2) Leave to appeal refused on ground 2 of the draft notice of appeal; (3) Within 7 days the appellant to file with the Registry a notice of appeal limited to ground 1 of the draft notice of appeal; (4) Appeal allowed on ground 1; (5) Set aside the orders made by Gibson DCJ on 19 December 2019 and in lieu thereof make the following orders: (a) Judgment entered for Mr Brien in the amount of $15,000; (b) Mr Mrad to pay Mr Brien's costs; (6) Mr Mrad to pay Mr Brien's costs of the appeal. Catchwords: DEFAMATION – defamatory matter – where publication pleaded differs from publication proved – test to be applied – whether language of 'fatal variance' helpful DEFAMATION – remedies – aggravated damages – court not in position to assess aggravated damages – leave refused Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), s 60 Defamation Act 1974 (NSW), s 9 Defamation Act 2005 (NSW), ss 25, 26, 40 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) r 14.30(3) Cases Cited: Besser v Kermode (2011) 81 NSWLR 157; [2011] NSWCA 174 Coles Supermarkets Australia Ltd v Clarke [2013] NSWCA 272 Dare v Pulham (1982) 148 CLR 658; [1982] HCA 70 Fairfax Media Publications v Zeccola (2015) 91 NSWLR 341; [2015] NSWCA 329 Fox v Percy (2003) 214 CLR 118; [2003] HCA 22 John Fairfax Publications Pty Ltd v Hitchcock (2007) 70 NSWLR 484; [2007] NSWCA 364 Oscar Kazal v Fairfax Media Publications Pty Ltd [2017] NSWSC 44 Tournier v National Provincial and Union Bank of England [1924] 1 KB 461 Zoef v Nationwide News Pty Ltd (No 2) [2017] NSWCA 2 Texts Cited: Gatley on Libel and Slander (12th ed, 2013, Sweet & Maxwell) Category: Principal judgment Parties: Martin Brien (applicant) Hussein Mrad (aka Sam Mrad) (respondent) Representation: Counsel: A T S Dawson SC with T B Senior (applicant) S Chrysanthou with N G Olson (respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate