NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Smith v Moore [2020] NSWSC 1446 Hearing dates: 17 and 18 August 2020 Date of orders: 19 October 2020 Decision date: 19 October 2020 Jurisdiction: Equity - Family Provision List Before: Williams J Decision: The plaintiff's application for provision out of the estate of the late Yvonne Gwendoline Smith is dismissed. Catchwords: SUCCESSION – family provision – claim by adult child for provision out of the deceased's estate – claimant is one of eight surviving adult children of deceased – deceased's last will provided a pecuniary legacy to the claimant and five of the other adult children with the residue of the estate given to the defendant executor and another adult child – common ground that burden of any provision in favour of claimant would fall on residuary beneficiaries – claimant and residuary beneficiaries each had a close and loving relationship with the deceased – residuary beneficiaries closely involved in caring for deceased as she aged – where claimant found to be in a long-standing close relationship with another person in which they depend on each other for mutual financial support – where claimant's debts exceed his total assets and expenditure exceeds income but no evidence of financial position of the other person in the relationship – where claimant and other person in the relationship gave false evidence that the claimant was indebted to the other person – not satisfied that adequate provision has not been made in the deceased's will for the claimant's proper maintenance, education and advancement in life – summons dismissed Legislation Cited: Succession Act 2006 (NSW), ss 57, 58, 59, 60 and 61 Cases Cited: Amaca Pty Ltd v Novek [2009] NSWCA 50 Blendell v Blendell [2020] NSWCA 154 Bowditch v NSW Trustee and Guardian [2012] NSWSC 275 Chan v Chan [2016] NSWCA 222 Chapple v Wilcox (2014) 87 NSWLR 646; [2014] NSWCA 392 Collings v Vakas [2006] NSWSC 393 Doshen v Pedisich [2013] NSWSC 1507 Foley v Ellis [2008] NSWCA 288 Grant v Roberts; Smith v Smith; Roberts v Smith; Curtis v Smith [2019] NSWSC 843 Hampson v Hampson [2010] NSWCA 359 Harris v Carter [2020] NSWSC 196 Keaton v Gumulak [2020] NSWSC 943 Middleton v Kiama District Hospital [1970] 3 NSWR 136 Olsen v Olsen (2019) 101 NSWLR 225; [2019] NSWCA 278 Page v Hull-Moody [2020] NSWSC 411 Sgro v Thompson [2017] NSWCA 326 Spata v Tumino (2018) 95 NSWLR 706; [2018] NSWCA 17 Steinmetz v Shannon (2019) 99 NSWLR 687; [2019] NSWCA 114 Vigolo v Bostin (2005) 221 CLR 191; [2005] HCA 11 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Kenneth David Smith (Plaintiff) Minerva Ruth Moore (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: Mr J E Armfield (Plaintiff) Mr S F Hughes (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate