NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Al Batat & Ors (No 29) [2020] NSWSC 1453 Hearing dates: 16 October 2020 Date of orders: 16 October 2020 Decision date: 16 October 2020 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Hamill J Decision: (1) The evidence of the telephone records relating to contact between the 397, 697 and 184 numbers is admissible. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – evidence - telephone records - whether particular number should be included in the schedule - circumstantial evidence - speculation - unfair prejudice - evidence admissible Legislation Cited: Evidence Act 1995 (NSW), s 137 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Regina Abdallah Hassan Al Batat Ying Cheng Luo Ian Fan Jaiyu Liu Jacob Blake Bayliss Nai An Li Representation: Counsel: P Hogan (Crown) B Rigg SC (Al Batat) R Webb (Luo) T Quilter (Fan) N Carroll (Liu) A Norrie (Bayliss) D Carroll (Li)
Solicitors: Solicitor for the NSW DPP (Crown) TS Law Firm (Al Batat) Voros Lawyers (Luo) Zahr & Partners (Fan) George Sten & Co (Liu) Ross Hill Lawyers (Bayliss) Younes & Espiner (Li) File Number(s): 2018/214586 (Al Batat) 2017/170943 (Luo) 2017/168582 (Fan) 2017/168476 (Liu) 2017/321618 (Bayliss) 2018/214894 (Li) Publication restriction: No publication until conclusion of trial
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate