NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Wecker v Davison [2020] NSWCA 264 Hearing dates: Monday, 19 October 2020 Decision date: 21 October 2020 Before: Bell P White JA Decision: (1) The summons seeking leave to appeal filed on 4 August 2020 and the notice of motion filed by the applicant on 8 September 2020 are dismissed. (2) Order that the applicant pay the respondents' costs of the summons and notice of motion. (3) Order that the applicant's claims for relief in proceeding 2019/294837 against the third respondent be dismissed with no order as to costs. Catchwords: CIVIL PROCEDURE — Court of Appeal — Leave to appeal – no issue of principle – leave refused Legislation Cited: Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) Limitation Act 1969 (NSW), ss 14B, 56A Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW), ss 46, 46B, 101 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), rr 13.4, 51.1 Cases Cited: Macatangay v State of New South Wales (No. 2) [2009] NSWCA 272 Muldrock v The Queen (2011) 244 CLR 120; [2011] HCA 39 Wecker v Davison [2019] NSWSC 1612 Wecker v Davison [2020] NSWSC 459 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Paul Josef Wecker (Applicant) Chris Davison (First Respondent) NSW Institute of Teachers (Second Respondent) State of New South Wales (Third Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Self-represented (Applicant) T Senior (First Respondent) n/a (Second Respondent) S Forster (Third Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate