NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Riva NSW Pty Limited v Mark A Fraser; Fraser v Riva (NSW) (No. 3) [2020] NSWSC 1472 Hearing dates: On the papers in chambers. Date of orders: 23 October 2020 Decision date: 23 October 2020 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Slattery J Decision: Directions given Catchwords: CIVIL PROCEDURE - dispute about the directions to prepare for a final hearing of a long-running contest as to costs – despite directions to do so, the parties cannot agree upon a proper set of directions – what directions should be given under Civil Procedure Act 2005, s 61(2)(c) – no question of principle. Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005, s 61(2)(c) Cases Cited: Bell Lawyers Pty Ltd v Pentelow (2019) 372 ALR 555 Riva NSW Pty Limited v Mark A Fraser; Fraser v Riva (NSW) (No. 2) [2020] NSWSC 1162 Category: Consequential orders Parties: In proceedings 2017/166645: First Plaintiff: Mark Fraser Second Plaintiff: Christopher Clancy trading as Fraser Clancy Lawyers First Defendant: Riva (NSW) Pty Ltd ACN 113881815
In proceedings 2017/59269: Plaintiff: Riva (NSW) Pty Ltd First Defendant: Mark A. Fraser & Christopher P. Clancy t/as Fraser Clancy Lawyers Representation: In proceedings 2017/166645 Counsel: Plaintiff: P. Barham Defendant: D.K.L Raphael
Solicitors: Plaintiff: Christopher Clancy, Clancy Lawyers Pty Ltd Defendant: Michael Coffey, Gells Lawyers
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate