NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Bond v R [2020] NSWCCA 277 Hearing dates: 7 September 2020 Date of orders: 28 October 2020 Decision date: 28 October 2020 Before: McCallum JA at [1] Campbell J at [2] N Adams J at [3] Decision: (1) Leave to appeal against sentence granted. (2) Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – sentence appeal – supply not less than commercial quantity of methylamphetamine – parity with sentence of co-offender – whether applicant had a justifiable sense of grievance – relevance of co-offender's rehabilitation efforts – relevance of additional Form 1 offences and standard non-parole period – subjective circumstances Legislation Cited: Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW), s 32 Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW), s 5(1) Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 (NSW), s 10(1), s 25(2), s 25A(1) Cases Cited: Dungay v R [2020] NSWCCA 209 Gaggioli v R [2014] NSWCCA 246 Green v The Queen (2011) 244 CLR 462; [2011] HCA 49 Huckstadt v R [2016] NSWCCA 22 Lloyd v R [2017] NSWCCA 303 Lowe v The Queen (1984) 154 CLR 606; [1984] HCA 46 Postiglione v The Queen (1997) 189 CLR 295; [1997] HCA 26 R v Newport [2020] NSWDC 245 R v Rutter [2003] NSWCCA 306 Usher v R [2016] NSWCCA 276 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Hugh Bond (Appellant) Crown (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Ms S Kluss ( Applicant) Ms K Jeffreys (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate