NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Singh v South Western Sydney Local Health District [2020] NSWCATAD 263 Hearing dates: 26 August 2020 Date of orders: 27 October 2020 Decision date: 27 October 2020 Jurisdiction: Administrative and Equal Opportunity Division Before: C Mulvey, Senior Member Decision: (1) The application to amend the temporal scope of the complaint is refused. (2) The matter is to be listed for further directions. Catchwords: HUMAN RIGHTS - Discrimination - Factors relevant to power to amend complaint under s103 Anti-Discrimination Act 1977 (NSW) power Legislation Cited: Anti-Discrimination Act 1977 (NSW), Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2003 (NSW) Cases Cited: A Braiding v Charles Sturt University (2015) NSWCATAD 242 Chand v Rail Corporation of New South Wales [EOD] (2007) NSWADTAP 54 McCrystal v Commissioner of Police, New South Wales Police Force (2018) NSWCATAD 299 Wecker v The Delegate (the Decisionmaker) to the President of the New South Wales Anti-Discrimination Board (2014) NSWCA 372 Zhang v Blinds Pty Limited t/as Blinds by Peter Meyer [2008] NSWADTAP 24 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Nazneen Singh (Applicant) South Western Sydney Local Health District (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: A Britt (Respondent)
Solicitors: NSW Nurses & Midwives Association (Applicant) File Number(s): 2020/00120016 Publication restriction: None
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate