NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: In the matter of Austral Bronze Pty Limited;; In the matter of John Darlington Pty Limited;; In the matter of John Darlington Pty Limited [2020] NSWSC 1491 Hearing dates: 28 July 2020 Date of orders: 26 October 2020 Decision date: 26 October 2020 Jurisdiction: Equity - Corporations List Before: Rees J Decision: Claim for privilege upheld in typed file notes and initial instruction sheet; privilege waived in handwritten file note. Catchwords: PRIVILEGE – client legal privilege – waiver – principles at [13]-[17] – employees suffering dust diseases seek legal advice – solicitor makes notes of communications – solicitor later refers to communications in affidavit – notice to produce – redacted file notes produced – production of part of note does not waive privilege in whole document unless unfairness arises. Legislation Cited: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), s 601AH Corporations Act 1989 (NSW), s 509 Dust Diseases Tribunal Act 1989 (NSW), s 12B Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW), s 15B Civil Liability (Third Party Claims Against Insurers Act 2017 (NSW), ss 4, 5 Evidence Act 1995 (NSW), ss 122(2), 122(3) Cases Cited: Archer Capital 4A Pty Ltd as trustee for the Archer Capital Trust 4A v Sage Group plc (No 2) (2013) 306 ALR 384; [2013] FCA 1098 Bailey v Department of Land and Water Conservation (2009) 74 NSWLR 333; [2009] NSWCA 100 Cantor v Audi Australia Pty Ltd [2016] FCA 1391 DSE (Holdings) Pty Ltd v Intertan Inc (2003) 127 FCR 499; [2003] FCA 384 Esso Australia Resources Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation (Cth) [1999] HCA 67; (1999) 201 CLR 49 Expense Reduction Analysts Group Pty Limited v Armstrong Strategic Management and Marketing Pty Limited [2013] HCA 46; (2013) 250 CLR 303 Great Atlantic Insurance Co v Home Insurance Co [1981] 1 WLR 529; [1981] 2 All ER 485 Hastie Group Limited (in liq) v Moore (t/as Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu) [2016] NSWCA 305; (2016) 339 ALR 635 In the matter of Viscount Caravans Pty Limited (ex tempore), 8 May 2020 Mann v Carnell (1999) 201 CLR 1; [1999] HCA 66 R v Derby Magistrates' Court; Ex parte B [1995] 4 All ER 526; [1996] AC 487 The Daniels Corp International Pty Ltd v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission [2002] HCA 49; (2002) 213 CLR 543 Category: Principal judgment Parties: In proceedings 2020/86229: Kathleen Comerford (Plaintiff) Australian Securities and Investments Commission (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate