NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Barrett v Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) [2020] NSWCA 270 Hearing dates: 12 October 2020 Date of orders: 12 October 2020 Decision date: 12 October 2020 Before: Basten JA at [38], [43]; Meagher JA at [42]; Brereton JA at [1] Decision: The Court orders that the application be dismissed with costs. Catchwords: JUDICIAL REVIEW – criminal proceedings – review of appeal to District Court – guilty plea entered in Local Court – application to traverse plea on appeal – application for leave to appeal out of time – application dismissed – whether arguable case of jurisdictional error JUDICIAL REVIEW – procedure – time limits –summons filed out of time in Court of Appeal – application to review District Court judgment – applicant legally represented when plea entered – extension of time to appeal to District Court refused – application for judicial review out of time – timely but invalid notice of appeal – public interest in finality – no arguable case of jurisdictional error – Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), r 59.10 Legislation Cited: Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 (NSW), ss 12, 13 Crimes (Domestic and Personal Violence) Act 2007 (NSW), ss 10, 13 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW), s 10 Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), s 61 Criminal Records Act 1991 (NSW), ss 5, 8 District Court Act 1973 (NSW), s 176 Mental Health (Forensic Provisions) Act 1990 (NSW), s 32 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), 59.10 Cases Cited: Gelle v Director of Public Prosecutions [2017] NSWCA 245; Ghaderi v Director of Public Prosecutions [2018] NSWCA 119 at 11 Jamal v Director of Public Prosecutions [2019] NSWCA 121 Lazarus v Independent Commission against Corruption [2019] NSWCA 100 Tay v Director of Public Prosecutions [2014] NSWCA 267 Category: Principal judgment Parties: William John Barrett (Applicant) Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) (First Respondent) District Court of New South Wales (Second Respondent) Representation: Counsel: William John Barrett (in person) Ms C O Gleeson (Respondents)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate