NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Australia City Properties Management Pty Ltd v The Owners – Strata Plan No 65111 [2020] NSWSC 1505 Hearing dates: 3-6; 11-12 August 2020 Date of orders: 28 October 2020 Decision date: 28 October 2020 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Darke J Decision: Declarations and orders to be made as summarised at [277] – [280]. Catchwords: LAND LAW – strata title – building manager – duration of caretaker agreement – agreement made in 2001 provides for 10 year term with options for three additional 5 year terms – legislation introduced in 2003 regulates appointments of caretakers and duration of caretaker agreements – effect of legislation including transitional provisions upon variations to caretaker agreement made in 2010 and 2015 – variations provided for additional options for further terms – held that agreement as varied not an agreement the duration of which is protected by transitional provisions – held that agreement as varied has maximum duration of 10 years from date when agreement as varied authorised caretaker to act under it – Strata Schemes Management Act 1996, s 40B and Sch 4 Part 4, cl 12 – effect of transitional provisions of Strata Schemes Management Act 2015, ss 66-70 and Sch 3 cll 3, 15 LAND LAW – strata title – owners corporation – meetings of owners corporation – voting by proxy – voting by a proxy who is a caretaker – where vote would confer or assist in conferring a material benefit on the proxy – where proxies held by persons said to be acting on behalf of caretaker as its agent – the provision that invalidates certain votes by a proxy who is a caretaker held to apply only to votes by the caretaker itself as proxy – Strata Schemes Management Act 1996, Sch 2 Part 2 cl 11 LAND LAW – strata title – building manager – cl 9.3 of caretaker agreement gives owners corporation the right to terminate the agreement if caretaker guilty of gross misconduct or gross negligence in performing its responsibilities – numerous allegations of misconduct or negligence including overcharging, standing for election to executive committee, improper use of electricity and failures in respect of fire safety – held that caretaker was guilty of gross misconduct in taking supply of electricity paid for by owners corporation over 18 year period – held that caretaker was guilty of gross misconduct or gross negligence in failing to promptly report to executive committee about unresolved faults in fire alarm system – owners corporation entitled to terminate caretaker agreement under cl 9.3 – right to terminate exercised by executive committee of owners corporation – right to terminate validly exercised despite no advance approval of general meeting of owners corporation – action of executive committee later ratified by resolution passed at general meeting – caretaker had not in the meantime terminated the agreement for repudiation by owners corporation – upon termination under cl 9.3 parties bound to follow regime laid down by cl 10 of agreement – owners corporation in breach of cl 10 by taking possession of caretaker lot, but conduct held not to be repudiatory – caretaker entitled to damages and compensation pursuant to usual undertaking as to damages for deprivation of possession of caretaker lot – Strata Schemes Management Act 2015, s 68(3) Legislation Cited: Strata Schemes Management Act 1996 (NSW), s 40B; Sch 2 Part 2, cl 11; Sch 4 Part 4, cl 12 Strata Schemes Management Act 2015 (NSW), ss 66-70, Sch 3, cll 3, 15 Cases Cited: 2 Elizabeth Bay Road Pty Ltd v The Owners – Strata Plan No 73943 (2014) 88 NSWLR 488; [2014] NSWCA 409 Berry v CCL Secure Pty Ltd (2020) 94 ALJR 715; [2020] HCA 27 Commissioner of Taxation v Sara Lee Household and Body Care (Australia) Pty Ltd (2000) 201 CLR 520; [2000] HCA 35 DCT Projects Pty Ltd v Champion Homes Sales Pty Ltd [2016] NSWCA 117 Electricity Generation Corporation v Woodside Energy Ltd (2014) 251 CLR 640; [2014] HCA 7 European Bank Limited v Evans (2010) 240 CLR 432; [2010] HCA 6 Hughes v NM Superannuation Pty Ltd (1993) 29 NSWLR 653 Koompahtoo Local Aboriginal Land Council v Sanpine Pty Ltd (2007) 233 CLR 115; [2007] HCA 61 Mount Bruce Mining Pty Ltd v Wright Prospecting Pty Ltd (2015) 256 CLR 104; [2015] HCA 37 Scott v Ennis-Oakes [2020] NSWCA 239 The Owners Strata Plan No 57164 v Yau (2016) 18 BPR 36,095; [2016] NSWSC 1056 The Owners Strata Plan No 57164 v Yau (2017) 96 NSWLR 587; [2017] NSWCA 341 Waldorf Apartment Hotel The Entrance Pty Ltd v Owners Corporation SP 71623 [2010] NSWCA 226 Wigan v Edwards (1973) 1 ALR 497 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Australia City Properties Management Pty Limited (First Plaintiff/Cross-Defendant) Bo Yun Wang (Second Plaintiff) The Owners - Strata Plan No. 65111 (Defendant/Cross-Claimant) Representation: Counsel: Mr N J Kidd SC with Mr S R Meehan (Plaintiffs/Cross Defendant) Mr S Free SC with Mr O Jones (Defendant/Cross-Claimant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate