NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Woodhead v Higgins [2020] NSWLEC 1520 Hearing dates: 6 October 2020 Date of orders: 6 October 2020 Decision date: 06 October 2020 Jurisdiction: Class 2 Before: Douglas AC Decision: The application is dismissed. Catchwords: TREES (DISPUTES BETWEEN NEIGHBOURS) – apprehension of damage and injury Legislation Cited: Trees (Disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 Cases Cited: Barker v Kyriakides [2007] NSWLEC 292 Dooley v Newell [2007] NSWLEC 715 Immarrata v Mourikis [2007] NSWLEC 601 McPherson v Lake [2017] NSWLEC 1081 Robson v Leischke (2008) 72 NSWLR 98; [2008] NSWLEC 152 Texts Cited: AS4373-2007 Pruning of Amenity Trees Category: Principal judgment Parties: Gary Woodhead (Applicant) Nicole Higgins (First Respondent) Robert Higgins (Second Respondent) Representation: G Woodhead (Litigant in person) (Applicant) N Higgins (Litigant in person) (First Respondent) R Higgins (Litigant in person) (Second Respondent) File Number(s): 2020/192960 Publication restriction: No
Judgment
This decision was given as an extemporaneous decision. It has been revised and edited prior to publication. 1. COMMISSIONER: This is an application, pursuant to s 7 of Pt 2 of the Trees (Disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006 (the Act) by Mr Woodhead, relating to a Eucalyptus saligna X botryoides (the tree) located in the adjacent neighbouring property.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate